170 down, 831 to go

Comments

[this is good]
This reminds me of my visit to Strand bookstore last weekend when I was waiting for them to bring me something down from the warehouse. An incredibly old man came up to the info counter looking for a copy of "1001 Places to See Before You Die." As he set off with a staff member who would find the book for him, I glanced around and I could tell I was thinking the exact same thing as each person around me. We each wanted to call after the staff member, "Move quickly! This man doesn't have much time!"

It's nice that with the list you've found it's less expensive to work on checking off all the items.

That's a great story. You've got to admire the man for his optimism. Or maybe he's already visited all the places and just wanted to double-check to make sure he didn't overlook one.

I'm going to look for 1001 Places the next time I'm in a bookstore. I bet I've only been to seven or eight of the places mentioned.

[this is good]
You're much more well read than I. Interesting to note that you didn't like To a Lighthouse and rated Lolita. I'm the other way round. I couldn't even finish Lolita it bored me so much. Maybe I ought to give it another try. I remember the language being too high-falutin for me. Nice to see War & Peace on there. I read that in Russian for a module as part of my Russian degree and then wrote a paper on it comparing he novel to Sergei Bondarchuk's 1968 movie version. It was a real struggle at the time but it's nice to be able to look back now and say that I did it. Tolstoy is much more easy to read in Russian than Dostoyevsky, let me tell you!

Of your 170, I've read 24!

Sure, you've only read 24 of my 170, but I bet you've read a lot of the other 831 I haven't gotten around to. On top of that, you've read Tolstoy and Dostoevsky in the original Russian. That's very impressive. I had enough trouble with them in English.

As far as To The Lighthouse vs. Lolita goes, I thought the former was perhaps the most boring book I've ever slogged through. I read Lolita as a teenager and I honestly don't remember much of it. I don't often reread books, but it's one I'd like to revisit. Nabokov is one of my all-time favorites, but that is really based more on Pnin and Pale Fire.

LOVED Pale Fire. I thought the poem alone was worth the cost of admission, and then you get that whole meta-fiction around it. Genius.

Any John Cheever on their list? He's essential for my money--although ironically I've only read his journals and short stories, none of the novels yet.

"Genius" is a word that is thrown around too often, but you're definitely right in applying it to Nabokov and Pale Fire.

John Cheever is another one they skipped over. His big red book of short stories is probably my all-time favorite collection and should have been included. (The only other collection that even comes close for me is Stories by T.C. Boyle.) As far as Cheever novels go, the only one I've ever read is The Wapshot Chronicle. I'd highly recommend it.

Post a comment

Already a Vox member? Sign in

M-----l

Archives

  • Powered by Vox